SKYDAO Discovers Expensive Difference Between 'Smart' Chain & Actual Smart
The figure is $183K on BNB Chain. The listing is the whole record.
SKYDAO lost $183,000 on BNB Smart Chain on September 30, 2026, the date on the record[1][2][3]. The page files the method as a swap logic flaw[4].
The target is a DeFi protocol, and its code is written in Solidity[5][6]. That figure stands alone, with no attacker wallet and no transaction hash named[2][3]. A holder has nothing to check against the approval list on BNB Smart Chain[3].
What to do: the record names no contract, no pool and no approval[4]. Nothing can be revoked on its word alone[4].
Who gains, who loses
Receipts
The SKYDAO incident was recorded as occurring on September 30, 2026.
“DeFiLlama records the SKYDAO incident on September 30, 2026.”
The reported loss in the SKYDAO incident was $183K.
“The reported loss is $183K.”
The affected chain was BNB Smart Chain, identified on the report as BSC.
“The listed chains are bsc.”
The incident was classified as a swap logic flaw.
“DeFiLlama labels the technique as Swap Logic Flaw.”
The affected system was classified as a DeFi protocol.
“Protocol Type DeFi Protocol”
The protocol was implemented in Solidity.
“Implementation language Solidity”
Cabal Desk is reporting, written with AI under human oversight. Every bracketed number opens its receipt: the source, the quoted span, the hash. Headlines and characterisations are commentary; the sourced facts are the receipts. Not investment advice. Corrections log. Editorial & legal.